Are perceptuo-motor decisions really more optimal than cognitive decisions?

Andreas Jarvstad, Ulrike Hahn, Paul A Warren, Simon K Rushton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Human high-level cognitive decisions appear sub-optimal (Kahneman, Slovic, & Tversky, 1982; Kahneman & Tversky, 1979). Paradoxically, perceptuo-motor decisions appear optimal, or nearly optimal (Trommershäuser, Maloney, & Landy, 2008). Here, we highlight limitations to the comparison of performance between and within domains. These limitations are illustrated by means of two perceptuo-motor decision-making experiments. The results indicate that participants did not optimize fundamental performance-related factors (precision and time usage), even though standard analyses may have classed participants as 'optimal'. Moreover, simulations and comparisons across our studies demonstrate that optimality depends on task difficulty. Thus, it seems that a standard model of perceptuo-motor decision-making fails to provide an absolute standard of performance. Importantly, this appears to be a limitation of optimal models of human behaviour in general. This, in conjunction with non-trivial evaluative- and methodological differences, suggests that verdicts favouring perceptuo-motor, or perceptual, systems over higher-level cognitive systems in terms of level of performance are premature.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)397-416
Number of pages20
JournalCognition
Volume130
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2014

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are perceptuo-motor decisions really more optimal than cognitive decisions?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this