Artifacts with Feelings/Feeling Artifacts: Toward a Notion of Tacit Modalities to Support and Propel Anthropological Research

Jennifer Rowsell*, Sandra Schamroth Abrams

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we consider the notion of tacit modalities as a theory and method for researchers. Based on research studies with individuals across ages and stages of life, we interviewed people about objects that they value, and what pervades all of the stories are tacit, lived properties that objects possess. The research ostensibly sought to extend work on the notion of artifactual literacies and tacit modalities, and, in the end, what stretched the research were sensory, embodied, and non-representational experiences expressed by collaborators in the research. This article focuses on three people’s stories about their felt experiences and sensory-led (and laden) stories associated with objects. To analyze interview data, we apply transdisciplinary theories that offer the reader a syncretic conceptual experience of tacit modalities as a method within ethnographic work to locate sensorial, affective dimensions of objects.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnthropology and Education Quarterly
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Dec 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the American Anthropological Association

Keywords

  • artifacts
  • ethnography
  • literacies
  • literacy studies
  • materialism
  • multimodality
  • sensory engagements
  • socio-materiality
  • tacit modalities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Artifacts with Feelings/Feeling Artifacts: Toward a Notion of Tacit Modalities to Support and Propel Anthropological Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this