Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of endovascular vs open revascularisation in severe occlusive aorto-iliac disease (EVOCC trial): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

  • Athanasios Saratzis*
  • , Alun Davies
  • , Athanasios Diamantopoulos
  • , Robert S M Davies
  • , David Epstein
  • , Marcus Jepson
  • , Daniel Perez
  • , Despina Apergi
  • , Keith Jonathan Harris
  • , Hany Zayed
  • , Cassandra Brookes
  • , Shaun Barber
  • , Ana Suazo Di Paola
  • , Luke Ingram
  • , Carla Richardson
  • , Anish Patel
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Severe aorto-iliac steno-occlusive atherosclerotic disease is a major cause of morbidity and amputation in patients with peripheral arterial disease. While both open surgical and endovascular revascularisation are standard treatments in this patient group, there is no high-quality randomised evidence to determine which approach offers superior clinical and cost-effectiveness, leading to uncertainty and poor outcomes after intervention.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The EVOCC trial is a national, multicentre, parallel-group, superiority randomised controlled trial comparing open surgery to endovascular revascularisation in patients with symptomatic severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease. A total of 628 participants across 30 NHS sites in the UK will be randomised 1:1 to receive either open surgery or endovascular (minimally invasive) intervention. The primary outcome is amputation-free survival, defined as time to first event (major lower limb amputation or death). Secondary outcomes include mortality, cardiovascular events, hospital readmissions, re-interventions and quality-of-life measures. An internal pilot phase (10 sites, 6-month duration) will assess recruitment feasibility. A QuinteT Recruitment Intervention is integrated into the trial to optimise recruitment.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has received ethical approval from a UK Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 23/SW/0065; trial registration reference: ISRCTN14591444). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants.The EVOCC trial is the first RCT assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of open vs endovascular revascularisation for severe aorto-iliac disease worldwide. The results will provide robust evidence to inform clinical practice and healthcare policies globally. Results will be disseminated via patient groups, online lay summaries, a trial website, social media, presentations in conferences, a formal scientific publication in a medical journal and direct communications with policymakers across borders.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN14591444.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere106474
Pages (from-to)e106474
Number of pages5
JournalBMJ Open
Volume15
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Oct 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group.

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Endovascular Procedures/economics
  • Iliac Artery/surgery
  • United Kingdom
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Amputation, Surgical/statistics & numerical data
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease/surgery
  • Aortic Diseases/surgery
  • Quality of Life
  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases/surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of endovascular vs open revascularisation in severe occlusive aorto-iliac disease (EVOCC trial): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this