Assessing the efficacy of offline water storage ponds for natural flood management

Tamsin Lockwood*, Jim Freer, Katerina Michaelides, Richard E. Brazier, Gemma Coxon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Land use changes, landscape modifications and changing climate have resulted in local to regional flood risk increases in recent decades. As an alternative to traditional engineering approaches, there has been a movement towards catchment-based flood risk management, a subset of which is natural flood management (NFM). NFM aims to enhance flood resilience through the slowing and storing of runoff and flow, based on the restoration and augmentation of hydrological and morphological catchment features. However, despite research highlighting their potential benefits, there is a limited quantity of robust and science-based empirical evidence on how these structures function in the landscape and their efficacy in reducing flood hazards. To address this knowledge gap and contribute to the growing NFM evidence base, this study evaluates the efficacy of offline water storage ponds for flow attenuation. Two contrasting pond sites in the Tone and Parrett catchment headwaters (SW-England) were monitored from April 2018 to December 2020 for channel flow, pond volume, and rainfall. Field-scale, high resolution (1.61 cm spatial support) digital elevation models from Structure-from-Motion and manual surveys were collected to quantify pond dynamics and connectivity. A comprehensive, storm definition methodology was developed for event separation, to enable quantification of the impact of pond behaviour on stream flow, across storm hydrographs. Results show that where offline ponds function as designed, with direct pond filling from the channel, peak flow attenuation can reach 7% (maximum event AEP of 83%). Smaller events, where pond filling occurs directly from rainfall or runoff display only a maximum of 3% peak flow reduction (event AEP from 83% –>99%). The ability of ponds to attenuate flow is heavily reliant on sufficient structural conditions for ponds to fill directly from the channel and to drain slowly following event peaks. This study provides an empirical database for future NFM applications, including key criteria for future design and for use as observational data in modelling applications, by upscaling the efficacy of ponds to reduce flood impacts at larger scales.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere14618
JournalHydrological Processes
Volume36
Issue number6
Early online date28 May 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was funded by a NERC CASE studentship NE/P010601/1, with additional funding from Natural England. We acknowledge assistance with NFM and catchment knowledge from project partners at FWAG-SW: Ben Thorne, Joanna Uglow, Angelique McBride and Sabine McEwan, and at Natural England: Louise Webb. We thank the landowners, Stuart Kinch and Nigel Vickery for site access. Project fieldwork was carried out with assistance from Rosie Lane, Victoria Hussey, Anna Covey, Jacky Lockwood, Isabelle Bi, Iskra Mejia-Estrada, John Lockwood, Owen Jones, Alexander Manning, Elizabeth Howling and Daniel Stanley. Merriott downstream pond was monitored by Angelique McBride. Drone flights were conducted with the University of Bristol Flight Lab, with assistance and expertise from Tom Richardson, Ben Schellenberg, Kieran Wood and Peiman Moradi. Event separation methodology and analysis was conducted with particular support from Alexander Manning. Jim Freer was partly supported for his time on this paper by the Global Water Futures program.

Funding Information:
This work was funded by a NERC CASE studentship NE/P010601/1, with additional funding from Natural England. We acknowledge assistance with NFM and catchment knowledge from project partners at FWAG‐SW: Ben Thorne, Joanna Uglow, Angelique McBride and Sabine McEwan, and at Natural England: Louise Webb. We thank the landowners, Stuart Kinch and Nigel Vickery for site access. Project fieldwork was carried out with assistance from Rosie Lane, Victoria Hussey, Anna Covey, Jacky Lockwood, Isabelle Bi, Iskra Mejia‐Estrada, John Lockwood, Owen Jones, Alexander Manning, Elizabeth Howling and Daniel Stanley. Merriott downstream pond was monitored by Angelique McBride. Drone flights were conducted with the University of Bristol Flight Lab, with assistance and expertise from Tom Richardson, Ben Schellenberg, Kieran Wood and Peiman Moradi. Event separation methodology and analysis was conducted with particular support from Alexander Manning. Jim Freer was partly supported for his time on this paper by the Global Water Futures program.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Hydrological Processes published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • attenuation
  • catchment
  • flood hazard
  • floodplain
  • natural flood management
  • pond

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the efficacy of offline water storage ponds for natural flood management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this