Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relative performance of hip prosthesis constructs as compared with the best performing prosthesis constructs and illustrate the substantial variability in performance of currently used prostheses.
DESIGN: A non-inferiority study.
SETTING: The National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man (NJR).
PARTICIPANTS: All patients with a primary total hip replacement registered in the NJR between 1 April 2003 and 31 December 2016.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kaplan-Meier failure function for hip prosthesis constructs. Failure difference between best performing construct and remaining constructs.
METHODS: Using a non-inferiority analysis, the performance of hip prosthesis constructs by brand were compared with the best performing contemporary construct. Construct failure was estimated using the 1-Kaplan-Meier survival function method, that is, an estimate of net failure. The difference in failure between the contemporary benchmark and all other constructs was tested.
RESULTS: Of the 4442 constructs used, only 134 had ≥500 procedures at risk at 3 years postprimary, 89 of which were not demonstrated to be inferior to the benchmark by at least 100% relative risk. By 10 years postprimary, there were 26 constructs with ≥500 at risk, 13 of which were not demonstrated to be inferior by at least 20% relative risk.Even fewer constructs were not inferior to the benchmark when analysed by age and gender. At 5 years postprimary, there were 15 constructs in males and 11 in females, aged 55-75 years, not shown to be inferior.
CONCLUSIONS: There is great variability in construct performance and the majority of constructs have not been demonstrated to be non-inferior to contemporary benchmarks. These results can help to inform patients, clinicians and commissioners when considering hip replacement surgery.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e026685 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | BMJ Open |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 29 Apr 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2019 |
Bibliographical note
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.Research Groups and Themes
- Centre for Surgical Research
Keywords
- benchmarking
- hip arthroplasty
- medical devices
- national joint registry
- non-inferiority
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the non-inferiority of prosthesis constructs used in hip replacement using data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man: A benchmarking study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Dr Adrian E Sayers
- Bristol Medical School (THS) - Senior Research Fellow
- Bristol Population Health Science Institute
Person: Academic , Member