Assessment of body image inpatients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer

RN Whistance; R Gilbert; P Fayers; RJ Longman; A Pullyblank; M Thomas; JM Blazeby

doi:10.1007/s00384-009-0851-7

Assessment of body image inpatients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer

RN Whistance
, R Gilbert
, P Fayers
, RJ Longman
, A Pullyblank
, M Thomas
, JM Blazeby

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose This study tested the scale properties and validity of the ten-item body image scale (BIS) in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods Patients completed the BIS and a validated measure of health-related quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30) after open or laparoscopic resection. A sample of the patients had also previously completed questionnaires before and after surgery. Multi-trait scaling and factor analysis were used to examine the questionnaire scaling, and tests of reliability, clinical and construct validity were performed. Results Eighty-two patients (48 male, 59 open, 23 laparoscopic) participated. Scaling analyses suggested a nine-item scale and one single item. This revised scale structure demonstrated good test-retest reliability (r = 0.94) and no overlap with the key domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (r

Translated title of the contribution	Assessment of body image inpatients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer
Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	369 - 374
Number of pages	6
Journal	International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Volume	25(3)
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0851-7
Publication status	Published - Mar 2010

Bibliographical note

Other: PMID: 19953257

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Access to Document

10.1007/s00384-009-0851-7

Handle.net

Persistent link

COLLABORATION AND INNOVATION IN DIFFICULT OR RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS
Blazeby, J. (Principal Investigator)
1/04/09 → 1/04/14
Project: Research

Cite this

@article{d53328910c5444249ad21e779feef190,

title = "Assessment of body image inpatients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer",

abstract = "Purpose This study tested the scale properties and validity of the ten-item body image scale (BIS) in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods Patients completed the BIS and a validated measure of health-related quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30) after open or laparoscopic resection. A sample of the patients had also previously completed questionnaires before and after surgery. Multi-trait scaling and factor analysis were used to examine the questionnaire scaling, and tests of reliability, clinical and construct validity were performed. Results Eighty-two patients (48 male, 59 open, 23 laparoscopic) participated. Scaling analyses suggested a nine-item scale and one single item. This revised scale structure demonstrated good test-retest reliability (r = 0.94) and no overlap with the key domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (r ",

author = "RN Whistance and R Gilbert and P Fayers and RJ Longman and A Pullyblank and M Thomas and JM Blazeby",

note = "Other: PMID: 19953257",

year = "2010",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1007/s00384-009-0851-7",

language = "English",

volume = "25(3)",

pages = "369 -- 374",

journal = "International Journal of Colorectal Disease",

issn = "0179-1958",

publisher = "Springer Nature",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of body image inpatients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer

AU - Whistance, RN

AU - Gilbert, R

AU - Fayers, P

AU - Longman, RJ

AU - Pullyblank, A

AU - Thomas, M

AU - Blazeby, JM

N1 - Other: PMID: 19953257

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Purpose This study tested the scale properties and validity of the ten-item body image scale (BIS) in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods Patients completed the BIS and a validated measure of health-related quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30) after open or laparoscopic resection. A sample of the patients had also previously completed questionnaires before and after surgery. Multi-trait scaling and factor analysis were used to examine the questionnaire scaling, and tests of reliability, clinical and construct validity were performed. Results Eighty-two patients (48 male, 59 open, 23 laparoscopic) participated. Scaling analyses suggested a nine-item scale and one single item. This revised scale structure demonstrated good test-retest reliability (r = 0.94) and no overlap with the key domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (r

AB - Purpose This study tested the scale properties and validity of the ten-item body image scale (BIS) in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods Patients completed the BIS and a validated measure of health-related quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30) after open or laparoscopic resection. A sample of the patients had also previously completed questionnaires before and after surgery. Multi-trait scaling and factor analysis were used to examine the questionnaire scaling, and tests of reliability, clinical and construct validity were performed. Results Eighty-two patients (48 male, 59 open, 23 laparoscopic) participated. Scaling analyses suggested a nine-item scale and one single item. This revised scale structure demonstrated good test-retest reliability (r = 0.94) and no overlap with the key domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (r

U2 - 10.1007/s00384-009-0851-7

DO - 10.1007/s00384-009-0851-7

M3 - Article (Academic Journal)

C2 - 19953257

SN - 0179-1958

VL - 25(3)

SP - 369

EP - 374

JO - International Journal of Colorectal Disease

JF - International Journal of Colorectal Disease

ER -

Assessment of body image inpatients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer

Abstract

Bibliographical note

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Projects

COLLABORATION AND INNOVATION IN DIFFICULT OR RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS

Cite this