TY - JOUR
T1 - Association between perinatal mortality and morbidity and customised and non-customised birthweight centiles in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Wales, and England
T2 - comparative, population based, record linkage study
AU - Kilpi, Fanny C
AU - Jones, Hayley E
AU - Magnus, Maria
AU - Santorelli, Gillian
AU - Hojsgaard Schmidt, Lise
AU - Kjaer Urhoj, Stine
AU - Nelson, Scott
AU - Tuffnell, Derek
AU - French, Robert
AU - Magnus, Per M
AU - Nybo Andersen, Anne-Marie
AU - Martikainen, Pekka
AU - Tilling, Kate M
AU - Lawlor, Debbie A
PY - 2023/8/30
Y1 - 2023/8/30
N2 - Objectives To compare the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes according to infants who are born small for gestational age (SGA; <10th centile) or large for gestational age (LGA; >90th centile), as defined by birthweight centiles that are non-customised (ie, standardised by sex and gestational age only) and customised (by sex, gestational age, maternal weight, height, parity, and ethnic group).Design Comparative, population based, record linkage study with meta-analysis of results.Setting Denmark, Finland, Norway, Wales, and England (city of Bradford), 1986-2019.Participants 2 129 782 infants born at term in birth registries.Main outcome measures Stillbirth, neonatal death, infant death, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and low Apgar score (<7) at 5 minutes.Results Relative to those infants born average for gestational age (AGA), both SGA and LGA births were at increased risk of all five outcomes, but observed relative risks were similar irrespective of whether non-customised or customised charts were used. For example, for SGA versus AGA births, when non-customised and customised charts were used, relative risks pooled over countries were 3.60 (95% confidence interval 3.29 to 3.93) versus 3.58 (3.02 to 4.24) for stillbirth, 2.83 (2.18 to 3.67) versus 3.32 (2.05 to 5.36) for neonatal death, 2.82 (2.07 to 3.83) versus 3.17 (2.20 to 4.56) for infant death, 1.66 (1.49 to 1.86) versus 1.54 (1.30 to 1.81) for low Apgar score at 5 minutes, and (based on Bradford data only) 1.97 (1.74 to 2.22) versus 1.94 (1.70 to 2.21) for admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. The estimated sensitivity of combined SGA or LGA births to identify the three mortality outcomes ranged from 31% to 34% for non-customised charts and from 34% to 38% for customised charts, with a specificity of 82% and 80% with non-customised and customised charts, respectively.Conclusions These results suggest an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes of a similar magnitude among SGA or LGA term infants when customised and non-customised centiles are used. Use of customised charts for SGA/LGA births—over and above use of non-customised charts for SGA/LGA births—is unlikely to provide benefits in terms of identifying term births at risk of these outcomes.Data availability statementData may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The register data can be used for scientific purposes by approved researchers by application to the relevant data-holding authorities of each country. For statistical code, please contact [email protected].
AB - Objectives To compare the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes according to infants who are born small for gestational age (SGA; <10th centile) or large for gestational age (LGA; >90th centile), as defined by birthweight centiles that are non-customised (ie, standardised by sex and gestational age only) and customised (by sex, gestational age, maternal weight, height, parity, and ethnic group).Design Comparative, population based, record linkage study with meta-analysis of results.Setting Denmark, Finland, Norway, Wales, and England (city of Bradford), 1986-2019.Participants 2 129 782 infants born at term in birth registries.Main outcome measures Stillbirth, neonatal death, infant death, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, and low Apgar score (<7) at 5 minutes.Results Relative to those infants born average for gestational age (AGA), both SGA and LGA births were at increased risk of all five outcomes, but observed relative risks were similar irrespective of whether non-customised or customised charts were used. For example, for SGA versus AGA births, when non-customised and customised charts were used, relative risks pooled over countries were 3.60 (95% confidence interval 3.29 to 3.93) versus 3.58 (3.02 to 4.24) for stillbirth, 2.83 (2.18 to 3.67) versus 3.32 (2.05 to 5.36) for neonatal death, 2.82 (2.07 to 3.83) versus 3.17 (2.20 to 4.56) for infant death, 1.66 (1.49 to 1.86) versus 1.54 (1.30 to 1.81) for low Apgar score at 5 minutes, and (based on Bradford data only) 1.97 (1.74 to 2.22) versus 1.94 (1.70 to 2.21) for admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. The estimated sensitivity of combined SGA or LGA births to identify the three mortality outcomes ranged from 31% to 34% for non-customised charts and from 34% to 38% for customised charts, with a specificity of 82% and 80% with non-customised and customised charts, respectively.Conclusions These results suggest an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes of a similar magnitude among SGA or LGA term infants when customised and non-customised centiles are used. Use of customised charts for SGA/LGA births—over and above use of non-customised charts for SGA/LGA births—is unlikely to provide benefits in terms of identifying term births at risk of these outcomes.Data availability statementData may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. The register data can be used for scientific purposes by approved researchers by application to the relevant data-holding authorities of each country. For statistical code, please contact [email protected].
U2 - 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000521
DO - 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000521
M3 - Article (Academic Journal)
C2 - 37663045
SN - 2754-0413
VL - 2
JO - BMJ Medicine
JF - BMJ Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - e000521
ER -