Balancing tolerance, security and Muslim engagement in the United Kingdom: the impact of the ‘Prevent’ agenda

Therese O'Toole, Daniel Nilsson N DeHanas, Tariq Modood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we consider how engagement with Muslims by the state has been
conducted under the UK government’s counter-radicalisation ‘Prevent’ agenda. New Labour’s ‘hearts and minds’ approach to Prevent emphasised, and innovated, engagement with Muslim ‘communities’. This approach was widely criticised, however, particularly in the way it merged Prevent with ‘Community Cohesion’. By contrast, the current Coalition government’s new Prevent strategy operates with a much thinner conception of engagement and stipulates that in future, Prevent and cohesion work will be kept separate. This new strategy signals less community engagement and a hardened line on the types of Muslim groups that can be engaged with. However, local actors driven by operational or normative concerns are pursuing somewhat different objectives, often outside of central funding streams. Such unintentional localism may sustain more participatory and inclusive modes of engagement with Muslims.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)373-389
JournalCritical Studies on Terrorism
Volume5
Issue number3
Early online date23 Oct 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012

Research Groups and Themes

  • SPAIS Centre for the Study of Ethnicity and Citizenship

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Balancing tolerance, security and Muslim engagement in the United Kingdom: the impact of the ‘Prevent’ agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this