Beetle iridescence induces an avoidance response in naïve avian predators

Karin M Kjernsmo*, Anna M Lim, Rox Middleton, Joanna R Hall, Leah M Costello, Heather M Whitney, Nicholas E Scott-Samuel, Innes C Cuthill

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)
127 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It has recently been found that iridescence, a taxonomically widespread form of animal coloration defined by a change in hue with viewing angle, can act as a highly effective form of camouflage. However, little is known about whether iridescence can confer a survival benefit to prey postdetection and, if so, which optical properties of iridescent prey are important for this putative protective function. Here, we tested the effects of both iridescence and surface gloss (i.e. specular reflection) on the attack behaviour of prey-naïve avian predators. Using real and artificial jewel beetle, Sternocera aequisignata, wing cases, we found that iridescence provides initial protection against avian predation by significantly reducing the willingness to attack. Importantly, we found that the main factor explaining this aversion is iridescence, not multiple colours per se, with surface gloss also having an independent effect. Our results are important because they demonstrate that even when prey are presented up close and against a mismatching background, iridescence may confer a survival benefit by inducing hesitation or even, as sometimes observed, an aversion response in attacking birds. Furthermore, this means that even postdetection, prey do not necessarily need to have secondary defences such as sharp spines or toxins for iridescence to have a protective effect. Taken together, our results suggest that reduced avian predation could facilitate the initial evolution of iridescence in many species of insects and that it is the defining feature of iridescence, its colour changeability, that is important for this effect.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-50
Number of pages6
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume188
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 May 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank James Chen and Thamasha Perera for assistance with the experiments. We are grateful to the Animal Services Unit (ASU) at the University of Bristol Veterinary School , especially Lionel Wheeler, for taking excellent care of our chicks. We thank Toshitaka Suzuki and two anonymous referees for helpful suggestions on the manuscript. Funding for this research was provided by the Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council , UK (grant BB/M002780/1 to H.M.W., N.E.S.-S. and I.C.C.).

Funding Information:
We thank James Chen and Thamasha Perera for assistance with the experiments. We are grateful to the Animal Services Unit (ASU) at the University of Bristol Veterinary School, especially Lionel Wheeler, for taking excellent care of our chicks. We thank Toshitaka Suzuki and two anonymous referees for helpful suggestions on the manuscript. Funding for this research was provided by the Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council, UK (grant BB/M002780/1 to H.M.W. N.E.S.-S. and I.C.C.).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors

Keywords

  • Aposematism
  • Gallus gallus domesticus
  • Gloss
  • Iridescence
  • Sternocera aequisignata
  • specular reflection
  • Predation
  • Protective coloration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beetle iridescence induces an avoidance response in naïve avian predators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this