Skip to content

Behavioral and neural evidence for an evaluative bias against other people's mundane interracial encounters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
JournalSocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
DateAccepted/In press - 18 Dec 2019


Evaluating other people’s social encounters from a third-person perspective is a ubiquitous activity of daily life. Yet little is known about how these evaluations are affected by racial bias. To overcome this empirical lacuna, two experiments were conducted. The first experiment used evaluative priming to show that both Black (n = 44) and White Americans (n = 44) assess the same mundane encounters (e.g., two people chatting) less favorably when they involve a Black and a White individual rather than two Black or two White individuals. The second experiment used functional magnetic resonance imaging to demonstrate that both Black (n = 46) and White Americans (n = 42) respond with reduced social reward processing (i.e., lower activity in the ventral striatum) and enhanced mentalizing (e.g., higher activity in the bilateral temporoparietal junction) towards so-called cross-race relative to same-race encounters. By combining unobtrusive measures from social psychology and social neuroscience, this work demonstrates that racial bias can affect impression formation even at the level of the dyad.

    Research areas

  • dyad perception, impression formation, person perception, prejudice, racial diversity

    Structured keywords

  • Social Cognition
  • Brain and Behaviour
  • Cognitive Neuroscience



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.59 MB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 1/01/99

    Request copy


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups