Bettering the Best Interests of the Child Determination: Of Checklists and Balancing Exercises

Devyani Prabhat, Jessica C Hambly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
268 Downloads (Pure)


The paper compares European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and UK court judgments on cross-border nationality cases concerning children and wholly domestic family law cases regarding children (without the cross-border element). It identifies different legal standards that apply to the well-being of children such as the best interests principle and the welfare principle and maps how successful these standards are in bringing in the views of children. It appears that cross-border nationality cases are unable to consider the interests of children as seriously as the wholly domestic family law cases. The domestic court approach of welfare brings in children’s views more effectively than nationality cases in domestic courts or at the ECtHR. It would benefit children if a rigorous best interests determination is carried out in nationality proceedings and a welfare approach is adopted consistent with family law cases.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)754-778
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of Children’s Rights
Issue number3-4
Early online date17 Nov 2017
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017


  • nationality
  • best interests


Dive into the research topics of 'Bettering the Best Interests of the Child Determination: Of Checklists and Balancing Exercises'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this