Beyond Coxian Historicism: 19th Century World Order and the Promise of Uneven and Combined Development

Jeremy Green*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article scrutinises Robert Cox's theorisation of 19th century world order, proposing 'uneven and combined development' as an alternative conceptual approach. I contend that Cox's understanding of 19th century world order is insufficient as it neglects the significance of German ascendance. Privileging hegemonic construction of world order, Cox's account of the decomposition of Pax Britannica reifies the neo-realist anarchy problematique. Overall, Cox exaggerates the degree of rupture between phases of world order, obscuring developmental continuities that produce different 'geopolitical' contexts. Uneven and combined development, I propose, enables a fruitful reappraisal of the period. Process-based international historical sociology is suggested as an alternative way to think about 19th century world order and critical IR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)286-308
Number of pages23
JournalMillennium
Volume42
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Keywords

  • anarchy
  • international historical sociology
  • uneven and combined development
  • world order

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond Coxian Historicism: 19th Century World Order and the Promise of Uneven and Combined Development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this