Abstract
Photosynthetic processes provide environmentally sustainable mechanisms for removal of CO2. Biological systems produce biomass which can act as a reservoir of carbon or as a direct substitute for fossil fuels. Three alternative strategies are examined and compared: Sequestration of carbon by reforestation; growing energy crops to offset the use of fossil fuels; and the use of photobiology and photobiochemistry. This report concludes that it is more efficient to use land to grow biomass for energy, offsetting fossil fuel use, than to simply sequester CO2 in forests. Biological systems are among the most promising alternatives for reducing atmospheric CO2 levels in combination with improved energy efficiencies. A comparative study is shown for 16 European countries, the USA and Japan.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 721-728 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Energy Conversion and Management |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 5-8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1992 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- Biomass
- energy
- Europe
- Japan
- photobiology
- photosynthetic efficiency
- sequestration
- substitution
- USA
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Biological systems for uptake of carbon dioxide'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver