Blood lipids and prostate cancer: a Mendelian randomization analysis

Caroline J Bull, Carolina Bonilla, Jeffrey M P Holly, Claire M Perks, Neil Davies, Philip Haycock, Oriana Hoi Yun Yu, J Brent Richards, Rosalind Eeles, Doug Easton, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, Ali Amin Al Olama, Sara Benlloch, Kenneth Muir, Graham G Giles, Robert J MacInnis, Fredrik Wiklund, Henrik Gronberg, Christopher A Haiman, Johanna SchleutkerBørge G Nordestgaard, Ruth C Travis, David Neal, Nora Pashayan, Kay-Tee Khaw, Janet L Stanford, William J Blot, Stephen Thibodeau, Christiane Maier, Adam S Kibel, Cezary Cybulski, Lisa Cannon-Albright, Hermann Brenner, Jong Park, Radka Kaneva, Jyotsna Batra, Manuel R Teixeira, Agnieszka Micheal, Hardev Pandha, George Davey Smith, Sarah J Lewis, Richard M Martin, the PRACTICAL Consortium

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

69 Citations (Scopus)
304 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Genetic risk scores were used as unconfounded instruments for specific lipid traits (Mendelian randomization) to assess whether circulating lipids causally influence prostate cancer risk. Data from 22,249 prostate cancer cases and 22,133 controls from 22 studies within the international PRACTICAL consortium were analyzed. Allele scores based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously reported to be uniquely associated with each of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and triglyceride (TG) levels, were first validated in an independent dataset, and then entered into logistic regression models to estimate the presence (and direction) of any causal effect of each lipid trait on prostate cancer risk. There was weak evidence for an association between the LDL genetic score and cancer grade: the odds ratio (OR) per genetically instrumented standard deviation (SD) in LDL, comparing high- (≥7 Gleason score) versus low-grade (<7 Gleason score) cancers was 1.50 (95% CI: 0.92, 2.46; P = 0.11). A genetically instrumented SD increase in TGs was weakly associated with stage: the OR for advanced versus localized cancer per unit increase in genetic risk score was 1.68 (95% CI: 0.95, 3.00; P = 0.08). The rs12916-T variant in 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) was inversely associated with prostate cancer (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.00; P = 0.03). In conclusion, circulating lipids, instrumented by our genetic risk scores, did not appear to alter prostate cancer risk. We found weak evidence that higher LDL and TG levels increase aggressive prostate cancer risk, and that a variant in HMGCR (that mimics the LDL lowering effect of statin drugs) reduces risk. However, inferences are limited by sample size and evidence of pleiotropy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1125-1136
Number of pages12
JournalCancer Medicine
Volume5
Issue number6
Early online date19 Mar 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016

Research Groups and Themes

  • ICEP

Keywords

  • Cholesterol
  • Mendelian randomization
  • prostate cancer
  • statins

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Blood lipids and prostate cancer: a Mendelian randomization analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • IEU Theme 3

    Windmeijer, F. (Principal Investigator), Tilling, K. M. (Researcher) & Tilling, K. M. (Principal Investigator)

    1/06/1331/03/18

    Project: Research

  • MRC UoB UNITE Unit - Programme 1

    Davey Smith, G. (Principal Investigator)

    1/06/1331/03/18

    Project: Research

Cite this