Skip to content

Buried pipelines with bends: Analytical verification against permanent ground displacements

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1782-1793
Number of pages12
JournalCanadian Geotechnical Journal
Issue number11
Early online date28 May 2016
DateAccepted/In press - 27 May 2016
DateE-pub ahead of print - 28 May 2016
DatePublished (current) - Nov 2016


Available analytical methodologies for the stress analysis of buried pipelines against large permanent ground displacements (PGDs) apply only to straight pipeline segments. Hence, a new methodology is proposed herein for the analytical computation of pipeline strains in bends of arbitrary angle and radius of curvature, located outside the PGD high-curvature zone, but within the pipeline’s unanchored length. The methodology is based on the equivalent-linear analysis of the bend, assuming that it will perform as an elastic arched beam subjected to uniformly distributed ultimate axial and transverse horizontal soil reactions. The end of the bend towards the PGD zone is subjected to an axial displacement, calculated on the basis of overall displacement compatibility along the pipeline, while the other end is restrained by the unanchored pipeline segment beyond the bend. Using this approach, the maximum axial force at the vicinity of the PGD zone can also be calculated and consequently used for the estimation of corresponding pipeline strains with any of the available numerical or analytical methodologies for straight pipeline segments. Parametric nonlinear finite element analyses are performed to verify the analytical methodology and also derive conclusions of practical interest regarding the effect of bends on pipeline design.

    Research areas

  • Analytical methodology, Bends, Faults, Permanent ground displacements, Pipelines

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via NRC Research Press at Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 743 KB, PDF document


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups