Business and Management Studies in the UK’s 2021 Research Excellence Framework: Implications for research quality assessment

Robert Blackburn, Sally Dibb, Ian Tonks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evaluating research is an established part of the research process, as funding agencies and governments seek to raise its quality and performance. The UK’s Research Excellence Framework 2021 (REF2021) was the eighth formal assessment of research in UK universities. Overall, 108 universities submitted 16,038 research outputs and 539 impact case studies for the period 2014-2020 to Sub-Panel 17 Business and Management Studies (B&M). Submissions were assessed by a panel of academic researchers and research users, nominated by a range of academic constituencies. The outcome was that the quality of UK research in B&M continues to improve since the REF2014. The quality profile for REF2021 had 79% of research assessed as 3-star (internationally excellent) and 4-star (world-leading). The paper explains and reports on our experiences of the peer review process, analyses the outcomes and discusses the state of research within the discipline. Subsequently, we consider the wider implications of the REF process, its methodologies and impacts, contributing to the debate about research quality in universities. The paper concludes with support for peer review and expresses caution against the automation of research quality assessment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)434-448
Number of pages15
JournalBritish Journal of Management
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Mar 2023

Keywords

  • Research Excellence Framework; higher education; university research; research evaluation; research quality; performance-research funding systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Business and Management Studies in the UK’s 2021 Research Excellence Framework: Implications for research quality assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this