Can you trust your robotic assistant?

Farshid Amirabdollahian, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Clare Dixon, Kerstin Eder, Michael Fisher, Kheng Lee Koay, Evgeni Magid, Tony Pipe, Maha Salem, Joe Saunders, Matt Webster

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference Contribution (Conference Proceeding)

2 Citations (Scopus)
34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Robotic assistants are being developed to assist with a range of tasks at work and home. Besides designing and developing such robotic assistants, a key issue that needs to be addressed is showing that they are both safe and trustworthy. We discuss our approach to this using formal verification, simulation-based testing and formative user evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Pages571-573
Number of pages3
Volume8239 LNAI
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Event5th International Conference on Social Robotics, ICSR 2013 - Bristol, United Kingdom
Duration: 27 Oct 2013 → 29 Oct 2013

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume8239 LNAI
ISSN (Print)03029743
ISSN (Electronic)16113349

Conference

Conference5th International Conference on Social Robotics, ICSR 2013
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityBristol
Period27/10/13 → 29/10/13

Keywords

  • Robotic assistants
  • Safety
  • Service robotics
  • Trust
  • Verification

Access to Document

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Can you trust your robotic assistant?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this