Capnography use in the critical care setting: why do clinicians fail to implement this safety measure?

Vincenzo Russotto, Tim M Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Tracheal intubation is among the most frequently performed manoeuvres in the critical care setting, and can be life-saving in critical illness, though also associated with serious adverse events such as oesophageal intubation or tracheal tube obstruction, displacement, or disconnection from the ventilator. A key finding of the 4th National Audit Project (NAP4) was identification of waveform capnography as the single intervention with the highest potential for reducing morbidity and mortality during tracheal intubation and maintenance of an artificial airway. In the INTUBE study, penetration of capnography into ICUs was low, and was not in use in 70% of the episodes of oesophageal intubation. To reduce harm and avoidable death, there is a need for a global initiative to increase access to and use of capnography in ICUs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)661-664
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume127
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2021 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Airway Obstruction/etiology
  • Capnography/methods
  • Critical Care/methods
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Capnography use in the critical care setting: why do clinicians fail to implement this safety measure?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this