Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Carbon footprints of greenhouse gas mitigation measures for a grass-based beef cattle finishing system in the UK

  • Asma Jebari*
  • , Taro Takahashi
  • , Michael R. F. Lee
  • , Adrian L. Collins
  • , Kevin Coleman
  • , Alison Carswell
  • , Carmen Segura
  • , Laura Cardenas
  • , Graham A. McAuliffe
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
Agri-food systems across the globe are faced with the challenge of reducing their supply-chain emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) such as nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), and methane (CH4). For instance, 10% of the UK’s GHG emissions are generated by agriculture, and ~ 56% of these are generated by livestock production. Numerous mitigation measures are being proposed to reduce GHG emissions from ruminants (representing 70 to 80% of total livestock emissions), particularly from beef cattle (presenting 30–40% of total livestock emissions).

Methods
To explore such potential, first, a business-as-usual (BAU) partial cradle-to-finishing farmgate scale modelling framework was developed. The BAU systems (i.e. steady-state productivity based on primary data from the North Wyke Farm Platform) were built using ensemble modelling wherein the RothC process-based soil organic carbon (SOC) model was integrated into the life cycle assessment (LCA) framework to conduct a trade-off analysis related to mitigation measures applicable to the study system. Potential mitigation measures were applied to the BAU scenario. The interventions assessed included: (i) extensification; (ii) adopting anaerobic digestion technology; and (iii) the use of the nitrification inhibitor DCD and substitution of fertiliser nitrogen with symbiotically fixed nitrogen from legumes.

Results
The partial carbon footprint for 1 kg of beef liveweight gain leaving the farmgate could be reduced by 7.5%, 12%, or 26% by adopting nitrification inhibitors, white clover introduction (pending establishment success), and anaerobic digestion for manure management, respectively.

Conclusions
The findings highlight the importance of including emissions beyond the farmgate level to analyse the carbon footprint of different management scenarios in order to assess the sustainability of agri-food production systems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)654-667
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume30
Issue number4
Early online date14 Jan 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
    SDG 2 Zero Hunger
  2. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  3. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Keywords

  • Nitrification inhibitor
  • Extensification
  • Soil organic carbon
  • Anaerobic digestion
  • Carbon footprint

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Carbon footprints of greenhouse gas mitigation measures for a grass-based beef cattle finishing system in the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this