Child mental health and educational attainment: Multiple observers and the measurement error problem

David Johnston, Carol Propper, Stephen Pudney*, Michael Shields

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine the effect of survey measurement error on the empirical relationship between child mental health and personal and family characteristics, and between child mental health and educational progress. Our contribution is to use unique UK survey data that contain (potentially biased) assessments of each child's mental state from three observers (parent, teacher and child), together with expert (quasi-)diagnoses, using an assumption of optimal diagnostic behaviour to adjust for reporting bias. We use three alternative restrictions to identify the effect of mental disorders on educational progress. Maternal education and mental health, family income and major adverse life events are all significant in explaining child mental health, and child mental health is found to have a large influence on educational progress. Our preferred estimate is that a one-standard-deviation reduction in 'true' latent child mental health leads to a 2- to 5-month loss in educational progress. We also find a strong tendency for observers to understate the problems of older children and adolescents compared to expert diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)880-900
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Applied Econometrics
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2014

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Child mental health and educational attainment: Multiple observers and the measurement error problem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this