Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Children of Hermes: What Archetypal Psychology and Classics Should Learn from Each Other

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter in a book

Abstract

This chapter argues that Jungian interpreters of classical myth should engage with classical scholarship and vice versa. It begins by mapping the different approaches that are typically called 'archetypal' and delineating theoretical dividing lines. It then offers a sample reading of a passage in the Homeric hymn to Hermes. This reading aims to show how a reading informed by both classical scholarship and Archetypal Psychology can greatly enrich the meaning of the text while remaining grounded in sound understanding of the evidence. It concludes by reflecting on how Archetypal Psychology can help classicists to answer a common question from students, namely why myths feel 'deep'.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Bloomsbury Handbook of Psychoanalysis and Classical Reception
EditorsPaul Allen Miller, Daniel Orrells, Richard Armstrong, Vanda Zajko
PublisherBloomsbury Academic
Publication statusSubmitted - 2025

Keywords

  • Archetypal Psychology
  • Carl Jung
  • Analytical Psychology
  • Hermes
  • Greek Myth
  • Imagination
  • Mythology
  • James Hillman
  • Goddess
  • Psychology
  • Greek Religion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Children of Hermes: What Archetypal Psychology and Classics Should Learn from Each Other'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this