Abstract
We define the (physical) opportunity cost of a choice x as the alternative that would be chosen if x were not available, and the opportunity cost of any unchosen alternative as x itself. The agent has preferences over pairs consisting of alternatives and their opportunity costs. Because costs affect choice and vice-versa, choice results from an intrapersonal equilibrium rather than from simple maximisation. In spite of significant rationality assumptions, the resulting behaviour can be highly non-standard, allowing intransitive choices. Rational utility maximisation is ensured by an additional new consistency condition on preferences. However, we argue that the maximised utility cannot be straightforwardly interpreted as a welfare relevant “revealed preference”. A generalisation of our model accommodates additional departures from standard rationality in the form of menu effects.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | rdaf101 |
| Journal | Review of Economic Studies |
| Early online date | 24 Nov 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Review of Economic Studies Limited.
Research Groups and Themes
- ECON Microeconomic Theory
- Opportunity costs
- Intransitive choice
- Menu effects
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Choice and Opportunity Costs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver