Abstract
A choice rule with affirmative action decides on the recipients of a limited number of identical objects by reconciling two objectives: respecting a priority ordering over the applicants and supporting a minority group. We extend the standard formulation of a choice problem by incorporating a type function and a priority ordering and introduce monotonicity axioms on how a choice rule should respond to variations in these parameters. We show that monotonic and substitutable affirmative action rules are the ones that admit a bounded reserve representation. As a prominent class of choice rules that satisfy the monotonicity axioms, we characterize lexicographic affirmative action rules that are prevalent both in the literature and in practice. Our axiomatic approach provides a novel way to think about reserve systems and uncovers choice rules that go beyond lexicographic affirmative action rules.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Management Science |
| Early online date | 8 Jun 2022 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 8 Jun 2022 |
Keywords
- Affirmative action
- bounded reserve representation
- lexicographic choice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Choice with Affirmative Action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver