Class composition, Labour's strategy, and the politics of work

Paul Thompson, Frederick Harry Pitts*, Jo Ingold, Jon Cruddas

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
98 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article locates the emergence of new thinking on the left of the Labour Party around work, age and assets within the lineage of ‘class composition’ analysis arising from the autonomist movement in mid-twentieth-century Italy. With reference to contemporary debates around electoral and political strategy within the Labour Party, the article critically appraises the potential applicability of this extra-parliamentary ‘militant methodology’ for the present-day identification of ontologically and epistemologically privileged class actors and political subjects in a first-past-the-post parliamentary system. Noting the resemblance of such approaches to the orthodox Marxist ‘gravedigger thesis’, which reads off from economic relations the existence of agents of social transformation, the article argues that this analytical and strategic framing represents a flawed approach for Labour and the wider left. Other approaches are needed to successfully navigate the pluralist construction of consent through coalition-building and compromise on which parliamentary politics rests.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)142-149
Number of pages8
JournalPolitical Quarterly
Volume93
Issue number1
Early online date29 Dec 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Mar 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Political Quarterly Publishing Co (PQPC).

Research Groups and Themes

  • MGMT Work Organisation and Public Policy
  • MGMT theme Work Futures

Keywords

  • Labour Party
  • class
  • work
  • political economy
  • British politics
  • electoral strategy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Class composition, Labour's strategy, and the politics of work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this