@article{3c4b88e7917d4ce1b9f7e81cc1b374f0,
title = "Class composition, Labour's strategy, and the politics of work",
abstract = "This article locates the emergence of new thinking on the left of the Labour Party around work, age and assets within the lineage of {\textquoteleft}class composition{\textquoteright} analysis arising from the autonomist movement in mid-twentieth-century Italy. With reference to contemporary debates around electoral and political strategy within the Labour Party, the article critically appraises the potential applicability of this extra-parliamentary {\textquoteleft}militant methodology{\textquoteright} for the present-day identification of ontologically and epistemologically privileged class actors and political subjects in a first-past-the-post parliamentary system. Noting the resemblance of such approaches to the orthodox Marxist {\textquoteleft}gravedigger thesis{\textquoteright}, which reads off from economic relations the existence of agents of social transformation, the article argues that this analytical and strategic framing represents a flawed approach for Labour and the wider left. Other approaches are needed to successfully navigate the pluralist construction of consent through coalition-building and compromise on which parliamentary politics rests.",
keywords = "Labour Party, class, work, political economy, British politics, electoral strategy",
author = "Paul Thompson and Pitts, {Frederick Harry} and Jo Ingold and Jon Cruddas",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Political Quarterly Publishing Co (PQPC).",
year = "2022",
month = mar,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1111/1467-923X.13097",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
pages = "142--149",
journal = "Political Quarterly",
issn = "0032-3179",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",
}