Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine classification criteria for multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS).
DESIGN: Machine learning of cases with MEWDS and 8 other posterior uveitides.
METHODS: Cases of posterior uveitides were collected in an informatics-designed preliminary database, and a final database was constructed of cases achieving supermajority agreement on diagnosis, using formal consensus techniques. Cases were split into a training set and a validation set. Machine learning using multinomial logistic regression was used on the training set to determine a parsimonious set of criteria that minimized the misclassification rate among the infectious posterior/panuveitides. The resulting criteria were evaluated on the validation set.
RESULTS: One thousand sixty-eight cases of posterior uveitides, including 51 cases of MEWDS, were evaluated by machine learning. Key criteria for MEWDS included: 1) multifocal gray white chorioretinal spots with foveal granularity; 2) characteristic imaging on fluorescein angiography ("wreath-like" hyperfluorescent lesions) and/or optical coherence tomography (hyper-reflective lesions extending from retinal pigment epithelium through ellipsoid zone into the retinal outer nuclear layer); and 3) absent to mild anterior chamber and vitreous inflammation. Overall accuracy for posterior uveitides was 93.9% in the training set and 98.0% (95% confidence interval 94.3, 99.3) in the validation set. The misclassification rates for MEWDS were 7% in the training set and 0% in the validation set.
CONCLUSIONS: The criteria for MEWDS had a low misclassification rate and appeared to perform sufficiently well for use in clinical and translational research.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 198-204 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | American Journal of Ophthalmology |
Volume | 228 |
Early online date | 9 Apr 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Funding/Support: The Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) Working Group was supported by National Eye Institute/National Institutes of Health grant R01 EY026593; the David Brown Fund; the Jillian M. and Lawrence A. Neubauer Foundation; and the New York Eye and Ear Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Inc.