Clinical and patient-reported outcomes in women offered oncoplastic breast conserving surgery as an alternative to mastectomy: ANTHEM multicentre prospective cohort study

Charlotte F Davies, Leigh R Johnson, Carmel M Conefrey, Nicola J Mills, Patricia Fairbrother, Chris Holcombe, Lisa Whisker, William Hollingworth, Joanna Skillman, Paul White, Douglas Macmillan, Charles Comins, Shelley Potter*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background
Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery may be a better option than mastectomy, but high-quality comparative evidence is lacking. The aim of the ANTHEM study (ISRCTN18238549) was to explore clinical and patient-reported outcomes in a multicentre cohort of women offered oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction.

Methods
Women with invasive/pre-invasive breast cancer who were offered oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery with volume replacement or displacement techniques to avoid mastectomy were recruited prospectively. Demographic, operative, oncological, and 3- and 12-month complication data were collected. The proportion of women choosing oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery and the proportion in whom breast conservation was successful were calculated. Participants completed the validated BREAST-Q questionnaire at baseline, 3 months after surgery, and 12 months after surgery. Questionnaires were scored according to the developers’ instructions and scores for each group were compared over time.

Results
In total, 362 women from 32 UK breast units participated, of whom 294 (81.2%) chose oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. Of the oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery patients in whom postoperative margin status was reported, 210 of 255 (82.4%) had clear margins after initial surgery and only 10 (3.9%) required completion mastectomy. Major complications were significantly more likely after immediate breast reconstruction. Women having oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery with volume displacement techniques reported significant improvements in baseline ‘satisfaction with breasts’ and ‘psychosocial well-being’ scores at 3 and 12 months, but both oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery groups reported significant decreases in ‘physical well-being: chest’ at 3 and 12 months.

Conclusion
Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery allows greater than 95% of women to avoid mastectomy, with lower major complication rates than immediate breast reconstruction, and may improve satisfaction with outcome. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery should be offered as an alternative to mastectomy in all women in whom it is technically feasible.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberznae306
Number of pages10
JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
Volume112
Issue number1
Early online date24 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.

Research Groups and Themes

  • HEHP@Bristol

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical and patient-reported outcomes in women offered oncoplastic breast conserving surgery as an alternative to mastectomy: ANTHEM multicentre prospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this