Research output per year
Research output per year
Andrew Perchard*, Niall G. MacKenzie, Stephanie Decker, Giovanni Favero
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review
On the back of recent and significant new debates on the use of history within business and management studies, we consider the perception of historians as being anti-theory and of having methodological shortcomings; and business and management scholars displaying insufficient attention to historical context and privileging of certain social science methods over others. These are explored through an examination of three subjects: strategy, international business and entrepreneurship. We propose a framework for advancing the use of history within business and management studies more generally through greater understanding of historical perspectives and methodologies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 904-927 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Business History |
Volume | 59 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 18 Aug 2017 |
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review