Abstract
An examination of case law on forced marriage reveals that in addition to physical force, the role of emotional pressure is now taken into consideration. However, in both legal and policy discourse, the difference between arranged and forced marriage continues to be framed in binary terms and hinges on the concept of consent: the context in which consent is constructed largely remains unexplored. By examining the socio-cultural construction of personhood, especially womanhood, and the intersecting structural inequalities that constrain particular groups of South Asian women in the UK, we argue that consent and coercion in relation to marriage can be better understood as two ends of a continuum, between which lie degrees of socio-cultural expectation, control, persuasion, pressure, threat and force. Women who face these constraints exercise their agency in complex and contradictory ways that are not always recognised by the existing exit-centred state initiatives designed to tackle this problem.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Marital Rights |
| Subtitle of host publication | The Library of Essays on Family Rights |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| Pages | 133-152 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781351559188 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781472465740 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2017 Robert Leckey.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
Research Groups and Themes
- SPS Centre for Gender and Violence Research
- SPS Social Harm Crime and Violence Research Centre
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Coercion, consent and the forced marriage debate in the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver