Skip to content

Combining qualitative research with PPI: reflections on using the person-based approach for developing behavioural interventions

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Article number34 (2019)
Number of pages8
JournalResearch Involvement and Engagement
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 16 Oct 2019
DatePublished (current) - 14 Nov 2019

Abstract

Background: The value and importance of qualitative research and Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) for developing complex health interventions is widely recognised. However, there is often confusion between the two, with researchers relying on just one of these approaches, rather than using the two alongside one another. 

Methods: The Person-Based Approach (PBA) to developing health-related behaviour change interventions adapts and integrates methods from user-centred design and qualitative research. The PBA involves qualitative research at multiple stages of interventions to ensure they are acceptable, feasible, meaningful, and optimally engaging to the people who will use them. The qualitative research is carried out with research participants from a target population, who have no prior or continuing involvement in the wider research process and see the intervention from a fresh perspective. This enables in-depth understanding of the views and experiences of a wide range of target users and the contexts within which they engage with behavioural change. PPI in research is carried out with or by members of the public and is a key part of the research process. PPI contributors are involved at all stages of research design and interpretation. PPI provides input into interventions as members of the research team alongside other stakeholders, such as health professionals and behaviour change experts. 

Results: We advocate using qualitative research alongside PPI at all stages of intervention planning, development, and evaluation. We illustrate this with examples from recent projects developing complex health interventions, highlighting examples where PPI and PBA have pulled in different directions and how we have approached this, how PPI have helped optimise interventions based on PBA feedback, and how we have engaged PPI in community settings.

Conclusions: PPI provides a valuable alternative to the traditional researcher-led approaches, which can be poorly matched to the needs of target users. Combining PPI with the PBA can help to create optimally engaging interventions by incorporating a greater diversity of feedback than would have been possible to achieve through PPI or qualitative approaches alone.

    Research areas

  • Patient and public involvement, Person-based approach, Qualitative research

    Structured keywords

  • Physical and Mental Health

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Springer Nature at https://researchinvolvement.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40900-019-0169-8. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 715 KB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups