Comment and Debate: Social class differences in early cognitive development

Harvey Goldstein, L Feinstein, John Jerrim, Anna Vignoles, Robert French, Liz Washbrook, RaeHuyck Lee, Ruth Lupton

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate (Academic Journal)

2 Citations (Scopus)
447 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In an opening paper Leon Feinstein reviews methodological criticism of his influential research into the relationship between early cognitive development and socioeconomic grades, based on UK 1970 Birth Cohort Study data. The points he raises are then debated in commentaries by John Jerrim and Anna Vignoles, Harvey Goldstein and Robert French, Elizabeth Washbrook and RaeHyuck Lee and Ruth Lupton.

Leon Feinstein's response to these comments will be published in the next issue of the journal.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)331-376
Number of pages46
JournalLongitudinal and Life Course Studies
Volume6
Issue number3
Early online date30 Jul 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2015

Keywords

  • Social Class
  • Measurement error
  • educational progress

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comment and Debate: Social class differences in early cognitive development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Projects

    Lemma 3

    Rintoul, D. A.

    1/10/1130/09/14

    Project: Research

    Cite this

    Goldstein, H., Feinstein, L., Jerrim, J., Vignoles, A., French, R., Washbrook, L., Lee, R., & Lupton, R. (2015). Comment and Debate: Social class differences in early cognitive development. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 6(3), 331-376. https://doi.org/10.14301/llcs.v6i3.361