Abstract
Purpose
Picking up from Cotter et al.’s article on the transferential process, this commentary aims to set out some arguments about ways of meeting the emotional needs of people with learning disabilities.
Design/methodology/approach
The commentary draws on two studies: one is about understanding and changing disabling practices, and the other is about bereavement support for people with learning disabilities. Both use qualitative approaches, and in both studies, people with learning disabilities are active agents or co-researchers, who have assisted in shaping the ideas and values of the research.
Findings
Professional practices, including those within a therapeutic context, can act as institutional barriers which create people with learning disabilities as passive or incompetent. However, this paper sets out some preliminary findings showing that not only can people with learning disabilities support each other, but also that face-to-face support workers can support people with learning disabilities to understand and cope with their emotions.
Practical implications
Frontline support workers should be seen as professionals, with their own range of resources to provide good emotional support. Further, people with learning disabilities can come together in groups to develop peer support about difficult and sensitive topics.
Originality/value
Talking therapies for people with learning disabilities have long been overlooked. As their value is now recognised, it is important that the views and wishes of people with learning disabilities themselves are heard, so that they can contribute to the processes which support them.
Picking up from Cotter et al.’s article on the transferential process, this commentary aims to set out some arguments about ways of meeting the emotional needs of people with learning disabilities.
Design/methodology/approach
The commentary draws on two studies: one is about understanding and changing disabling practices, and the other is about bereavement support for people with learning disabilities. Both use qualitative approaches, and in both studies, people with learning disabilities are active agents or co-researchers, who have assisted in shaping the ideas and values of the research.
Findings
Professional practices, including those within a therapeutic context, can act as institutional barriers which create people with learning disabilities as passive or incompetent. However, this paper sets out some preliminary findings showing that not only can people with learning disabilities support each other, but also that face-to-face support workers can support people with learning disabilities to understand and cope with their emotions.
Practical implications
Frontline support workers should be seen as professionals, with their own range of resources to provide good emotional support. Further, people with learning disabilities can come together in groups to develop peer support about difficult and sensitive topics.
Originality/value
Talking therapies for people with learning disabilities have long been overlooked. As their value is now recognised, it is important that the views and wishes of people with learning disabilities themselves are heard, so that they can contribute to the processes which support them.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Tizard Learning Disability Review |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 21 Jun 2017 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - Sept 2017 |