Commentary: The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article (Academic Journal) › peer-review

Translated title of the contribution	Commentary: The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems
Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	933
Number of pages	1
Journal	British Journal of General Practice
Volume	53
Publication status	Published - Dec 2003

Access to Document

@article{310c7a8d3e3a4d74af47d2c7c4b75e10,

title = "Commentary: The quality of record keeping in primary care: a comparison of computerised, paper and hybrid systems",

author = "J Sterne",

year = "2003",

month = dec,

language = "English",

volume = "53",

pages = "933",

journal = "British Journal of General Practice",

issn = "1478-5242",

publisher = "Royal College of General Practitioners",

}