Abstract
Remarkably, the interaction between common law and statute has not attracted the scholarly attention it deserves, given that it is such a basic component of legal reasoning in common law systems. This is especially true in the law of employment, where the interaction between common law and statute is a pervasive feature of modern employment law. In recent years, scholars have started to rise to the challenge of developing principles to regulate this interaction, and this article provides a contribution to those debates. It builds upon Lord Hoffmann’s controversial judgment in Johnson v Unisys to identify three modes of interaction: statute as pre-emptive of common law development; statute as an analogical stimulus of common law development; and common law fundamental rights. By connecting this analysis to background principles of legislative supremacy and fundamental rights, it argues that Johnson v Unisys provides an attractive constitutional vision of the relationship between Parliament and the courts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 67-113 |
| Number of pages | 47 |
| Journal | Current Legal Problems |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 16 Nov 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Common Law and Statute in the Law of Employment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver