Communicating to increase public uptake of pandemic flu vaccination in the UK: Which messages work?

Fiona Mowbray, Afrodita Marcu, Cristina A Godinho, Susan Michie, Lucy Yardley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vaccination is considered the most effective preventive measure against influenza transmission, yet vaccination rates during the 2009/10 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic were low across the world, with the majority of people declining to receive the vaccine. Despite extensive research on the predictors of uptake of influenza vaccination, little research has focused on testing the effectiveness of evidence and theory-based messages.

AIMS: To examine the persuasiveness of messages promoting vaccination and antiviral use either as health-enhancing or as risk-reducing, as well as messages which conveyed evidence-based information about the costs and benefits of vaccination, or which applied anticipated regret as a motivator for vaccine uptake.

METHOD: We conducted 11 focus groups with forty-one members of the general population in England including young and older adults, those with lower education, parents, and those with elevated health risk. The data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS: The factual, evidence-based messages were well received with participants finding them the most convincing and useful, particularly where they gave cost-benefit comparisons. Health-enhancing messages were received with scepticism and concern that the messages were not honest about the potential lack of safety of vaccination. In contrast, risk-reduction messages were perceived as being more balanced and credible. Messages aiming to elicit feelings of anticipated regret for not getting vaccinated were generally perceived as patronising and unprofessional.

CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination messages should be kept brief, but convey balanced, evidence-based information, and be transparent in their communication of potential side-effects. The general public seem to prefer messages that are factual and emphasise the costs and benefits of vaccination, particularly with regards to vaccine safety.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3268-74
Number of pages7
JournalVaccine
Volume34
Issue number28
Early online date8 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jun 2016

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Structured keywords

  • Physical and Mental Health

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Communication
  • Female
  • Focus Groups
  • Health Promotion/methods
  • Humans
  • Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype
  • Influenza Vaccines/therapeutic use
  • Influenza, Human/prevention & control
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Patient Education as Topic
  • Risk Reduction Behavior
  • United Kingdom
  • Vaccination/psychology
  • Young Adult

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Communicating to increase public uptake of pandemic flu vaccination in the UK: Which messages work?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this