Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparative evaluation of approaches to propositionalization

M-A Krogel, S Rawles, F Železný, PA Flach, N Lavrač, S Wrobel

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference Contribution (Conference Proceeding)

    78 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Propositionalization has already been shown to be a promising approach for robustly and effectively handling relational data sets for knowledge discovery. In this paper, we compare up-to-date methods for propositionalization from two main groups: logic-oriented and database-oriented techniques. Experiments using several learning tasks --- both ILP benchmarks and tasks from recent international data mining competitions --- show that both groups have their specific advantages. While logic-oriented methods can handle complex background knowledge and provide expressive first-order models, database-oriented methods can be more efficient especially on larger data sets. Obtained accuracies vary such that a combination of the features produced by both groups seems a further valuable venture.
    Translated title of the contributionComparative evaluation of approaches to propositionalization
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationUnknown
    EditorsTamas Horvath, Akihiro Yamamoto
    PublisherSpringer Berlin Heidelberg
    Pages194 - 217
    Number of pages23
    ISBN (Print)3540201440
    Publication statusPublished - Oct 2003

    Bibliographical note

    Conference Proceedings/Title of Journal: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Inductive Logic Programming (ILP'2003)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative evaluation of approaches to propositionalization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this