Background Reducing of COVID-19 transmission relies on controlling droplet and aerosol spread. Fluorescein staining reveals microscopic droplets. We used this technique to compare the droplet spread in a standard theatre (ST) and a laminar air flow theatre (LAF). Methods We used a ‘cough-generator’ fixed to a theatre trolley at 45-degrees. Fluorescein stained ‘secretions’ were projected onto a series of calibrated targets. These were photographed under UV light and a ‘source detection’ software measured droplet splatter size and distance. Results The smallest droplet detected was ≅ 120 μm and the largest ≅ 24,000 μm. We detected an average of 25,862 spots in the ST, compared with 11,430 in the LAF (56% reduction). The LAF mainly affected the smaller droplets (<1000 microns). The surface area covered with droplets was: 6% at 50 cm, 1% at 2 m and 0.5% at 3 m in the ST; and 3%, 0.5% and 0.2% in the LAF respectively. Conclusion Accurate mapping droplet spread in clinical environments is possible using fluorescein staining and image analysis. The laminar flow affected the smaller droplets but had limited effect on larger droplets in our AGP cough model. Our results indicate that LAF require similar post-surgery cleaning to those of ST and staff should consider full PPE for medium and high-risk patients.
Bibliographical noteFunding Information:
This research was submitted to, and received support from, the University of Portsmouth Ethics Committee and the South Central – Berkshire NHS Research Ethics Committee. No patient data were collected during this research.
This work was supported by an Impact Accelerator Account, Science and Technology Facilities Council . A.A. is supported by the Royal Society Wolfson Fellowship. B.R.B. is supported by the Natural Environment Research Council ( NE/P018459/1 ).
© 2021 The Healthcare Infection Society
- image analysis