Skip to content

Comparison of Gridded Precipitation Datasets for Rainfall-Runoff and Inundation Modeling in the Mekong River Basin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • Sophal Try
  • S Tanaka
  • Kenji Tanaka
  • Takahiro Sayama
  • Chantha Oeurng
  • Uk Sovannara
  • Kaoru Takara
  • Maochuan Hu
  • Dawei Han
Original languageEnglish
JournalPLoS ONE
Early online date8 Jan 2020
DOIs
DateAccepted/In press - 9 Dec 2019
DateE-pub ahead of print (current) - 8 Jan 2020

Abstract

Precipitation is a primary hydrological process in the water cycle, and it is an indispensable input in hydrological modeling. The reliability of hydrological modeling is highly related to the quality of precipitation data. Accurate long-term gauged precipitation in the Mekong River Basin, however, is limited; therefore, the main objective of this study is to assess the performances of various gridded precipitation datasets in rainfall-runoff and flood-inundation modeling in the whole basin. First, the performance of the Rainfall-Runoff-Inundation (RRI) model in this basin was evaluated using the gauged rainfall. The calibration (2000-2003) and validation (2004-2007) results indicated that the RRI model had acceptable performance in the Mekong River Basin. Then, five available gridded precipitation datasets including APHRODITE, GPCC, PERSIANN-CDR, GSMaP (RNL), and TRMM (3B42V7) from 2000 to 2007 were input into the calibrated model. The results of the simulated river discharge indicated that TRMM, GPCC, and APHRODITE performed better than other datasets. The statistical index of annual maximum flood inundated area indicated similar conclusions. Thus, APHRODITE, TRMM, and GPCC precipitation datasets were considered suitable for rainfall-runoff and flood inundation modeling in the Mekong River Basin. This study provides useful guidance for the application of gridded precipitation in hydrological modeling in the Mekong River basin

Download statistics

No data available

Documents

Documents

  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Accepted author manuscript, 1 MB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 1/01/99

    Request copy

  • Full-text PDF (final published version)

    Rights statement: This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via PLOS at https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0226814 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Final published version, 3 MB, PDF document

    Licence: CC BY

DOI

View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups