Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial comparing group-based outpatient physiotherapy with usual care in patients following total knee replacement.
DESIGN:
A feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial.
SETTING:
One secondary-care hospital orthopaedic centre, Bristol, UK.
PARTICIPANTS:
A total of 46 participants undergoing primary total knee replacement.
INTERVENTIONS:
The intervention group were offered six group-based exercise sessions after surgery. The usual care group received standard postoperative care. Participants were not blinded to group allocation.
OUTCOME MEASURES:
Feasibility was assessed by recruitment, reasons for non-participation, attendance, and completion rates of study questionnaires that included the Lower Extremity Functional Scale and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score.
RESULTS:
Recruitment rate was 37%. Five patients withdrew or were no longer eligible to participate. Intervention attendance was high (73%) and 84% of group participants reported they were 'very satisfied' with the exercises. Return of study questionnaires at six months was lower in the usual care (75%) than in the intervention group (100%). Mean (standard deviation) Lower Extremity Functional Scale scores at six months were 45.0 (20.8) in the usual care and 57.8 (15.2) in the intervention groups.
CONCLUSION:
Recruitment and retention of participants in this feasibility study was good. Group-based physiotherapy was acceptable to participants. Questionnaire return rates were lower in the usual care group, but might be enhanced by telephone follow-up. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale had high responsiveness and completion rates. Using this outcome measure, 256 participants would be required in a full-scale randomized controlled trial.
To evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial comparing group-based outpatient physiotherapy with usual care in patients following total knee replacement.
DESIGN:
A feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial.
SETTING:
One secondary-care hospital orthopaedic centre, Bristol, UK.
PARTICIPANTS:
A total of 46 participants undergoing primary total knee replacement.
INTERVENTIONS:
The intervention group were offered six group-based exercise sessions after surgery. The usual care group received standard postoperative care. Participants were not blinded to group allocation.
OUTCOME MEASURES:
Feasibility was assessed by recruitment, reasons for non-participation, attendance, and completion rates of study questionnaires that included the Lower Extremity Functional Scale and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score.
RESULTS:
Recruitment rate was 37%. Five patients withdrew or were no longer eligible to participate. Intervention attendance was high (73%) and 84% of group participants reported they were 'very satisfied' with the exercises. Return of study questionnaires at six months was lower in the usual care (75%) than in the intervention group (100%). Mean (standard deviation) Lower Extremity Functional Scale scores at six months were 45.0 (20.8) in the usual care and 57.8 (15.2) in the intervention groups.
CONCLUSION:
Recruitment and retention of participants in this feasibility study was good. Group-based physiotherapy was acceptable to participants. Questionnaire return rates were lower in the usual care group, but might be enhanced by telephone follow-up. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale had high responsiveness and completion rates. Using this outcome measure, 256 participants would be required in a full-scale randomized controlled trial.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 487-499 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Clinical Rehabilitation |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 11 Apr 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2017 |
Research Groups and Themes
- Centre for Surgical Research
Keywords
- Group-based exercise
- feasibility
- randomized controlled trial
- total knee replacement
