Conclusion: The comparative political economy of talent, identity and ethnic hierarchy

William S. Harvey*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter in a book

Abstract

This chapter summarizes some of the main arguments presented in the book and provides some avenues for further research and policy. The chapter argues that the experiences of skilled workers has been varied. It is clear that skilled workers are a valuable group with high levels of human and social capital that many countries are seeking to attract and retain. The experiences of these workers are highly heterogeneous and there are significant consequences for how countries and organizations engage with this group. With greater information, choice and access to intermediaries, countries and organizations need to avoid being complacent with how they engage with and signal value to skilled workers in the global war for talent. The chapter concludes with two observations. First, there is a need for a more joined-up approach to understanding skilled migration from the perspective of governments, regulatory bodies and organizations rather than treating these actors in isolation. Second, there have been some sweeping generalizations around how countries and organizations can more effectively compete in the global war for talent. While there are lessons to be learned, countries and organizations need to tailor their approaches to their unique contexts rather than adopting uniform policies.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Political Economy of Brain Drain and Talent Capture
Subtitle of host publicationEvidence from Malaysia and Singapore
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Pages141-149
Number of pages9
ISBN (Electronic)9780429773174
ISBN (Print)9781138366077
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 selection and editorial matter, Adam Tyson; individual chapters, the contributors.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conclusion: The comparative political economy of talent, identity and ethnic hierarchy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this