“Conjuring Nineteenth-Century Black Environmentalism.”

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter in a book

Abstract

This chapter bridges Environmental Humanities and Black Humanities by examining a figure largely, if curiously, excluded from the ‘ecocritical’ canon: Charles Chesnutt, the first African American writer of commercially successful fiction. Reading literary environmentalism beyond the lenses of Romanticism or Transcendentalism, Forbes finds in Chesnutt’s late nineteenth-century conjure tales a richly imagined Black environmental heritage that connected race and nature. Chesnutt’s short fiction featuring metamorphoses of humans into plants and animals represents a key node in an alternate, and non-linear, Black environmentalist timeline. In contrast to environmentalisms that pit nature’s interests against humans’, the insights we see at flashpoints across this tradition, and crucially in Chesnutt’s conjure tales, belie narratives of human/nature separation that underpin most “white” environmentalisms. Moreover, his marshalling of racialized nonhuman agencies also helps us address persistent difficulties associated with new materialist theorizing. Fusing human/plant/animal agencies to frameworks of care and nurturance, characters in Chesnutt’s conjure tales weaponize “waste” against enslavement’s inhuman valuation systems.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication The New Nineteenth-Century American Literary Studies
EditorsRuss Castronovo, Robert Levine
PublisherCambridge University Press
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2024

Structured keywords

  • Centre for Black Humanities

Keywords

  • ecocriticism
  • new materialism
  • environmental heritage
  • African American literature
  • Black humanities
  • environmental humanities
  • Charles Chesnutt
  • supernatural
  • superstition
  • folktales
  • storytelling
  • vernacular
  • metaphor
  • agency
  • temporality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Conjuring Nineteenth-Century Black Environmentalism.”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this