Skip to content

Constraining lowermost mantle anisotropy with body waves: A synthetic modeling study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Constraining lowermost mantle anisotropy with body waves : A synthetic modeling study. / Creasy, Neala; Pisconti, Angelo; Long, Maureen D.; Thomas, Christine; Wookey, James.

In: Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 217, No. 2, 05.2019, p. 766-783.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Creasy, N, Pisconti, A, Long, MD, Thomas, C & Wookey, J 2019, 'Constraining lowermost mantle anisotropy with body waves: A synthetic modeling study', Geophysical Journal International, vol. 217, no. 2, pp. 766-783. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz049

APA

Creasy, N., Pisconti, A., Long, M. D., Thomas, C., & Wookey, J. (2019). Constraining lowermost mantle anisotropy with body waves: A synthetic modeling study. Geophysical Journal International, 217(2), 766-783. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz049

Vancouver

Creasy N, Pisconti A, Long MD, Thomas C, Wookey J. Constraining lowermost mantle anisotropy with body waves: A synthetic modeling study. Geophysical Journal International. 2019 May;217(2):766-783. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz049

Author

Creasy, Neala ; Pisconti, Angelo ; Long, Maureen D. ; Thomas, Christine ; Wookey, James. / Constraining lowermost mantle anisotropy with body waves : A synthetic modeling study. In: Geophysical Journal International. 2019 ; Vol. 217, No. 2. pp. 766-783.

Bibtex

@article{b67efbd079834437b35fddc305a4d2b4,
title = "Constraining lowermost mantle anisotropy with body waves: A synthetic modeling study",
abstract = "Different mechanisms have been proposed as explanations for seismic anisotropy at the base of the mantle, including crystallographic preferred orientation of various minerals (bridgmanite, post-perovskite, and ferropericlase) and shape preferred orientation of elastically distinct materials such as partial melt. Investigations of the mechanism for D{"} anisotropy usually yield ambiguous results, as seismic observations rarely (if ever) uniquely constrain a mechanism or orientation and usually rely on significant assumptions to infer flow patterns in the deep mantle. Observations of shear wave splitting and polarities of SdS and PdP reflections off the D{"} discontinuity are among our best tools for probing D{"} anisotropy; however, currently available datasets cannot constrain one unique scenario among those suggested by the mineral physics literature. In this work, we determine via a forward modeling approach what combinations of body wave phases (e.g. SKS, SKKS, and ScS) are required to uniquely constrain a mechanism for D{"} anisotropy. We test nine models based on single-crystal and polycrystalline elastic tensors provided by mineral physics studies. Our modeling predicts fast shear wave splitting directions for SKS, SKKS, and ScS phases, as well as polarities of P and S wave reflections off the D{"} interface, for a range of propagation directions, via solution of the Christoffel equation. We run tests using randomly selected synthetic datasets based on a given starting model, controlling the total number of measurements, the azimuthal distribution, and the type of seismic phases. For each synthetic dataset, we search over all possible elastic tensors and orientations to determine which are consistent with the synthetic data. Overall, we find it difficult to uniquely constrain the mechanism for anisotropy with a typical number of seismic anisotropy measurements (based on currently available studies) with only one measurement technique (SKS, SKKS, ScS, or reflection polarities). However, datasets that include SKS, SKKS, and ScS measurements, or a combination of shear wave splitting an reflection polarity measurements, increase the probability of uniquely constraining the starting model and its orientation. Based on these findings, we identify specific regions (i.e., North America, northwestern Pacific, and Australia) of the lowermost mantle with sufficient raypath coverage for a combination of measurement techniques.",
keywords = "Composition and structure of the mantle, Mantle processes, Seismic anisotropy, Statistical seismology",
author = "Neala Creasy and Angelo Pisconti and Long, {Maureen D.} and Christine Thomas and James Wookey",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1093/gji/ggz049",
language = "English",
volume = "217",
pages = "766--783",
journal = "Geophysical Journal International",
issn = "0956-540X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS - suitable for import to EndNote

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constraining lowermost mantle anisotropy with body waves

T2 - A synthetic modeling study

AU - Creasy, Neala

AU - Pisconti, Angelo

AU - Long, Maureen D.

AU - Thomas, Christine

AU - Wookey, James

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - Different mechanisms have been proposed as explanations for seismic anisotropy at the base of the mantle, including crystallographic preferred orientation of various minerals (bridgmanite, post-perovskite, and ferropericlase) and shape preferred orientation of elastically distinct materials such as partial melt. Investigations of the mechanism for D" anisotropy usually yield ambiguous results, as seismic observations rarely (if ever) uniquely constrain a mechanism or orientation and usually rely on significant assumptions to infer flow patterns in the deep mantle. Observations of shear wave splitting and polarities of SdS and PdP reflections off the D" discontinuity are among our best tools for probing D" anisotropy; however, currently available datasets cannot constrain one unique scenario among those suggested by the mineral physics literature. In this work, we determine via a forward modeling approach what combinations of body wave phases (e.g. SKS, SKKS, and ScS) are required to uniquely constrain a mechanism for D" anisotropy. We test nine models based on single-crystal and polycrystalline elastic tensors provided by mineral physics studies. Our modeling predicts fast shear wave splitting directions for SKS, SKKS, and ScS phases, as well as polarities of P and S wave reflections off the D" interface, for a range of propagation directions, via solution of the Christoffel equation. We run tests using randomly selected synthetic datasets based on a given starting model, controlling the total number of measurements, the azimuthal distribution, and the type of seismic phases. For each synthetic dataset, we search over all possible elastic tensors and orientations to determine which are consistent with the synthetic data. Overall, we find it difficult to uniquely constrain the mechanism for anisotropy with a typical number of seismic anisotropy measurements (based on currently available studies) with only one measurement technique (SKS, SKKS, ScS, or reflection polarities). However, datasets that include SKS, SKKS, and ScS measurements, or a combination of shear wave splitting an reflection polarity measurements, increase the probability of uniquely constraining the starting model and its orientation. Based on these findings, we identify specific regions (i.e., North America, northwestern Pacific, and Australia) of the lowermost mantle with sufficient raypath coverage for a combination of measurement techniques.

AB - Different mechanisms have been proposed as explanations for seismic anisotropy at the base of the mantle, including crystallographic preferred orientation of various minerals (bridgmanite, post-perovskite, and ferropericlase) and shape preferred orientation of elastically distinct materials such as partial melt. Investigations of the mechanism for D" anisotropy usually yield ambiguous results, as seismic observations rarely (if ever) uniquely constrain a mechanism or orientation and usually rely on significant assumptions to infer flow patterns in the deep mantle. Observations of shear wave splitting and polarities of SdS and PdP reflections off the D" discontinuity are among our best tools for probing D" anisotropy; however, currently available datasets cannot constrain one unique scenario among those suggested by the mineral physics literature. In this work, we determine via a forward modeling approach what combinations of body wave phases (e.g. SKS, SKKS, and ScS) are required to uniquely constrain a mechanism for D" anisotropy. We test nine models based on single-crystal and polycrystalline elastic tensors provided by mineral physics studies. Our modeling predicts fast shear wave splitting directions for SKS, SKKS, and ScS phases, as well as polarities of P and S wave reflections off the D" interface, for a range of propagation directions, via solution of the Christoffel equation. We run tests using randomly selected synthetic datasets based on a given starting model, controlling the total number of measurements, the azimuthal distribution, and the type of seismic phases. For each synthetic dataset, we search over all possible elastic tensors and orientations to determine which are consistent with the synthetic data. Overall, we find it difficult to uniquely constrain the mechanism for anisotropy with a typical number of seismic anisotropy measurements (based on currently available studies) with only one measurement technique (SKS, SKKS, ScS, or reflection polarities). However, datasets that include SKS, SKKS, and ScS measurements, or a combination of shear wave splitting an reflection polarity measurements, increase the probability of uniquely constraining the starting model and its orientation. Based on these findings, we identify specific regions (i.e., North America, northwestern Pacific, and Australia) of the lowermost mantle with sufficient raypath coverage for a combination of measurement techniques.

KW - Composition and structure of the mantle

KW - Mantle processes

KW - Seismic anisotropy

KW - Statistical seismology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063750724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/gji/ggz049

DO - 10.1093/gji/ggz049

M3 - Article

VL - 217

SP - 766

EP - 783

JO - Geophysical Journal International

JF - Geophysical Journal International

SN - 0956-540X

IS - 2

ER -