Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Consultation complexity and professionals consulted: a retrospective cohort study in English primary care

Jialan Hong*, Peter Jonathan Edwards, Mavin Nathan Kashyap, Hugh Mcleod, Chris Salisbury, Nicola Walsh, Ben Bennett, Isobel L Ward, John Macleod, Christopher Penfold, Maria T Redaniel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Background:
The Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) launched in England in 2019 to expand the multidisciplinary primary care workforce, but its impact on workload since implementation is unclear.

Aim:
To examine changes in workload complexity associated with ARRS implementation.

Design and setting:
A longitudinal cohort study was conducted, which used the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum. In total, 3 530 628 consultations were analysed involving GPs, nurses, or direct patient care (DPC)-ARRS roles for 420 986 patients from 369 English practices in 2018 and 2021.

Method:
Multilevel logistic regression assessed associations between 17 patient and consultation complexity factors and being seen by a DPC-ARRS role, adjusting for year, age, sex, region, deprivation, and consultation mode.

Results:
Complex consultations with DPC-ARRS-eligible roles increased from 15.8% in 2018 to 18.8% in 2021. Diagnostically capable ARRS roles were more likely than GPs to conduct the first consultation after diabetes diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3 to 1.5) and consultations with ≥2 preventive tasks (OR 5.6, 95% CI = 5.5 to 5.8), but less likely to manage chronic pain (OR 0.8, 95% CI = 0.7 to 0.9), dementia (OR 0.4, 95% CI = 0.3 to 0.4), mental illness (OR 0.4, 95% CI = 0.3 to 0.5), learning disabilities (OR 0.3, 95% CI = 0.3 to 0.4), consultations with ≥3 medicines prescribed (OR 0.6, 95% CI = 0.5 to 0.6), consultations resulted in emergency admission (OR 0.7, 95% CI = 0.6 to 0.8), and consultations with ≥2 diagnoses coded (OR 0.5, 95% CI = 0.5 to 0.5). Patients with interpreter needs (OR 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1 to 1.3), experiencing recent homelessness (OR 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1 to 1.7), or ≥3 long-term conditions (OR 1.1, 95% CI = 1.1 to 1.1) were more likely to be seen by diagnostic ARRS staff.

Conclusion:
Following ARRS implementation, primary care activity was delivered by a broader workforce managing increasingly complex care. Further research should assess the safety, quality, and system impacts of ARRS roles.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2025.0670
Pages (from-to)e453-e463
Number of pages29
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Volume76
Issue number767
Early online date1 May 2026
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 May 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, The Authors.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Consultation complexity and professionals consulted: a retrospective cohort study in English primary care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this