Contemporary Reflections on Substantial Kind Change in Avicenna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

Abstract

Contemporary metaphysics, and especially neo-Aristotelian metaphysics, tackles many of the same problems as Avicenna did. One of these problems is the possibility of substantial kind change. For instance, is it possible for an animal to change its species? Aristotle and Avicenna both regarded species to be eternal, but their metaphysics might allow for individuals to change their kinds—what is important is that one kind cannot change into another kind. From a contemporary perspective, this may seem odd, given what we know about the evolution of species. Moreover, phenomena like beta decay seem to suggest that a given sample of an element may change into another element, so one might think that contemporary science allows both changing kinds and substantial kind change. Yet, I suggest that the essentialist metaphysics that has developed from Aristotle to neo-Aristotelian metaphysics, via Avicenna, may already possess the necessary tools to accommodate all this.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70010
JournalTheoria
Early online date25 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Theoria published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Stiftelsen Theoria.

Keywords

  • Philosophy
  • Avicenna
  • Natural Kinds
  • Species
  • Metaphysics
  • Essentialism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contemporary Reflections on Substantial Kind Change in Avicenna'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this