Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 4: Debate on Paper 1 from the perspective of COMET [Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials]

Paula R Williamson; Jane M Blazeby; Sara T. Brookes; Mike Clarke; Caroline B. Terwee; Bridget  Young

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.014

Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 4: Debate on Paper 1 from the perspective of COMET [Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials]

Paula R Williamson^*, Jane M Blazeby, Sara T. Brookes, Mike Clarke, Caroline B. Terwee, Bridget Young

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate (Academic Journal)

8 Citations (Scopus)

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Comments on Chevance et al ‘Improving the generalizability and credibility of core outcome sets (COS) by a large and international participation of diverse stakeholders’.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	222-224
Number of pages	3
Journal	Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume	125
Early online date	13 May 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.014
Publication status	Published - 1 Sept 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Crown Copyright © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.014

Full-text PDF (accepted manuscript)
This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (Version of Record) can be found on the publisher's website. The copyright of any third-party content, such as images, remains with the copyright holder.
Accepted author manuscript, 145 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

@article{6e16a825dd064d7aaaf9fb8b73c20644,

title = "Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 4: Debate on Paper 1 from the perspective of COMET [Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials]",

abstract = "Comments on Chevance et al {\textquoteleft}Improving the generalizability and credibility of core outcome sets (COS) by a large and international participation of diverse stakeholders{\textquoteright}.",

author = "Williamson, \{Paula R\} and Blazeby, \{Jane M\} and Brookes, \{Sara T.\} and Mike Clarke and Terwee, \{Caroline B.\} and Bridget Young",

year = "2020",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.014",

language = "English",

volume = "125",

pages = "222--224",

journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",

issn = "0895-4356",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 4: Debate on Paper 1 from the perspective of COMET [Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials]. / Williamson, Paula R; Blazeby, Jane M; Brookes, Sara T. et al.
In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 125, 01.09.2020, p. 222-224.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate (Academic Journal)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 4

T2 - Debate on Paper 1 from the perspective of COMET [Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials]

AU - Williamson, Paula R

AU - Blazeby, Jane M

AU - Brookes, Sara T.

AU - Clarke, Mike

AU - Terwee, Caroline B.

AU - Young, Bridget

PY - 2020/9/1

Y1 - 2020/9/1

N2 - Comments on Chevance et al ‘Improving the generalizability and credibility of core outcome sets (COS) by a large and international participation of diverse stakeholders’.

AB - Comments on Chevance et al ‘Improving the generalizability and credibility of core outcome sets (COS) by a large and international participation of diverse stakeholders’.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.014

DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.014

M3 - Comment/debate (Academic Journal)

C2 - 32413391

SN - 0895-4356

VL - 125

SP - 222

EP - 224

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

ER -

Controversy and Debate Series on Core Outcome Sets. Paper 4: Debate on Paper 1 from the perspective of COMET [Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials]

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Handle.net

Fingerprint

Cite this