Conversation, Disagreement and Political Participation

C. J. Pattie*, R. J. Johnston

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the more striking findings in recent work on political discussion among citizens has been that exposure to disagreement in discussion networks demobilises people, making political participation less likely. This runs counter to the expectations of theories of social capital and deliberative democracy, and also to the finding that exposure to cross-cutting views leads to greater tolerance of the opinions of others. This result is of great significance if it proves to be a general finding, holding in a variety of contexts and for a range of forms of political activism. This paper therefore provides a test, analysing a wide range of forms of political activism. The results suggest that it is premature to blame disagreement for demobilisation: in some circumstances, and for some forms of activism, exposure to countervailing views may actually motivate participation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-285
Number of pages25
JournalPolitical Behaviour
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009

Keywords

  • Political participation
  • Conversation
  • Disagreement
  • SOCIAL NETWORKS
  • TALK
  • CONTEXT
  • CONSEQUENCES
  • CITIZENS

Cite this