Skip to content

Core information set for informed consent to surgery for oral or oropharyngeal cancer: A mixed-methods study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)624-631
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Otolaryngology
Issue number2
Early online date27 Nov 2017
DateAccepted/In press - 24 Nov 2017
DateE-pub ahead of print - 27 Nov 2017
DatePublished (current) - 1 Apr 2018


Objectives: To develop a core information set for informed consent to surgery for oral/oropharyngeal surgery. A core information set is baseline information rated important by patients and surgeons and is intended to improve patients' understanding of the intended procedure. Design: A mixed-methods study. Systematic reviews of scientific and written healthcare literature, qualitative interviews and observations, Delphi surveys, and group consensus meetings identified information domains of importance for consent. Setting: A regional head and neck clinic in the United Kingdom. Questionnaire participants were recruited from around the UK. Participants: Patients about to undergo, or who had previously undergone, surgery for oral/oropharyngeal cancer. Healthcare professionals involved in the management of head and neck cancer. Main outcome measures: The main outcome was a core information set. Results: Systematic reviews, interviews and consultation observations yielded 887 pieces of information that were categorised into 87 information domains. Survey response rates were 67% (n = 50) and 71% (n = 52) for patient and healthcare professional groups in round one. More than 90% responded in each group in the second round. Healthcare professionals were more likely to rate information about short-term or peri-operative events as important while patients rated longer term issues about survival and quality of life. The consensus-building process resulted in an agreed core information set of 13 domains plus two procedure-specific domains about tracheostomy and free-flap surgery. Conclusion: This study produced a core information set for surgeons and patients to discuss before surgery for oral/oropharyngeal cancer. Future work will optimise ways to integrate core information into routine consultations.

    Structured keywords

  • Centre for Surgical Research

Download statistics

No data available



  • Full-text PDF (accepted author manuscript)

    Rights statement: This is the author accepted manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Wiley at . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.

    Accepted author manuscript, 488 KB, PDF document


View research connections

Related faculties, schools or groups