Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Core Set of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Measuring Quality of Life in Clinical Obesity Care

  • Phillip J Dijkhorst*
  • , Valerie M. Monpellier
  • , Caroline B Terwee
  • , Ronald Liem
  • , Bart A. van Wagensveld
  • , Ignace M.C. Janssen
  • , Johan Ottosson
  • , Bruno Halpern
  • , Stuart Flint
  • , Elisabeth F.C. van Rossum
  • , Alend Saadi
  • , Lisa West-Smith
  • , Mary O'Kane
  • , Jason C.G. Halford
  • , Karen D Coulman
  • , Salman Al-Sabah
  • , John B Dixon
  • , Wendy A. Brown
  • , Ximena Ramos Salas
  • , Sally Abbott
  • Alyssa J Budin, Jennifer F Holland, Lotte Poulsen, Richard Welbourn, Natasja Wijling, Laura Divine, Nadya Isack, Susie Birney, JM Bernadette Keenan, Theodore K Kyle, Melanie Bahlke, Andrew Healing, Ian Patton, Claire E.E. de Vries
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose:
The focus of measuring success in obesity treatment is shifting from weight loss to patients’ health and quality of life. The objective of this study was to select a core set of patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures to be used in clinical obesity care.

Materials and Methods:
The Standardizing Quality of Life in Obesity Treatment III, face-to-face hybrid consensus meeting, including people living with obesity as well as healthcare providers, was held in Maastricht, the Netherlands, in 2022. It was preceded by two prior multinational consensus meetings and a systematic review.

Results:
The meeting was attended by 27 participants, representing twelve countries from five continents. The participants included healthcare providers, such as surgeons, endocrinologists, dietitians, psychologists, researchers, and people living with obesity, most of whom were involved in patient representative networks. Three patient-reported outcome measures (patient-reported outcomes) were selected: the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (self-esteem) measure, the BODY-Q (physical function, physical symptoms, psychological function, social function, eating behavior, and body image), and the Quality of Life for Obesity Surgery questionnaire (excess skin). No patient-reported outcome measure was selected for stigma.

Conclusion:
A core set of patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures for measuring quality of life in clinical obesity care is established incorporating patients’ and experts’ opinions. This set should be used as a minimum for measuring quality of life in routine clinical practice. It is essential that individual patient-reported outcome measure scores are shared with people living with obesity in order to enhance patient engagement and shared decision-making.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2980-2990
Number of pages11
JournalObesity Surgery
Volume34
Issue number8
Early online date15 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Research Groups and Themes

  • HEHP@Bristol
  • Centre for Academic Primary Care

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Core Set of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Measuring Quality of Life in Clinical Obesity Care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this