Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with stable coronary artery disease: The CE-MARC 2 coronary physiology sub-study

David Corcoran, Robin Young, David Adlam, Alex McConnachie, Kenneth Mangion, David Ripley, David Cairns, Julia Brown, Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci, Andreas Baumbach, Rajesh Kharbanda, Keith G. Oldroyd, Gerry P. McCann, John P. Greenwood, Colin Berry*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle (Academic Journal)peer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)
321 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: In patients with angina undergoing invasive management, no obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) is a common finding, and angina may persist following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Coronary microvascular dysfunction may be relevant. We aimed to assess the proportion of patients presenting with suspected CAD who had coronary microvascular dysfunction. Methods: Clinical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Coronary Heart Disease 2 (CE-MARC 2) was a prospective multicenter randomised controlled trial of functional imaging versus guideline-based management in patients with suspected CAD. Invasive coronary angiography was protocol-directed. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and parameters of microvascular function (coronary flow reserve (CFR), index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), resistance reserve ratio (RRR)) were measured in major epicardial coronary arteries with ≥40–≤90% diameter stenosis. An FFR value ≤0.80 indicated the presence of obstructive CAD. Results: 267/1202 (22.2%) patients underwent angiography and 81 (30%) patients had FFR measured. 63 (78%) of these patients had microvascular function assessed in 85 arteries (mean age 58.5 ± 8.2 years; 47 (75%) male). 25/63 (40%) patients had NOCAD, and of these, 17 (68%) had an abnormality ≥1 parameter of microvascular function (abnormal IMR (≥25), abnormal CFR (<2.0), and abnormal RRR (<2.0) occurred in 10 (40%), 12 (48%), and 11 (44%), respectively). 38/63 (60%) patients had obstructive epicardial CAD. Of these patients, 15/38 (39%), 20/38 (53%), and 12/38 (32%) had an abnormal IMR, CFR and RRR, respectively. Conclusions: Coronary microvascular dysfunction is common in patients with angina. Invasive assessment of microvascular function may be informative and relevant for decision-making in patients with both NOCAD and obstructive epicardial CAD. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01664858

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-14
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume266
Early online date19 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2018

Keywords

  • Angina
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Coronary microvascular dysfunction
  • Stable ischaemic heart disease

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with stable coronary artery disease: The CE-MARC 2 coronary physiology sub-study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this