Abstract
The relationship between criminal law and regulatory techniques in responses to corporate
crime is complex and changing. The Serious Fraud Office’s increased proactivity in
relation to economic crime is precariously balanced on the fulcrum of criminal and
regulatory rhetoric. In this paper I note significant developments and suggest that the
similarities and differences between regulatory and criminal law approaches to corporate
accountability are ripe for re-examination.
| Translated title of the contribution | Corporate Crime: Opening the Eyes of the Sentry |
|---|---|
| Original language | English |
| Pages (from-to) | 370-390 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Legal Studies |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2010 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher: BlackwellUN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Research Groups and Themes
- PolicyBristolBusinessAndEconomicPolicy
- Corporate crime
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate Crime: Opening the Eyes of the Sentry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver