Abstract
Changes to corporate criminal liability over the last ten years have been dramatic with the introduction of two major new offences: corporate manslaughter in 2007 and failure to prevent commercial bribery in 2010. Both offences are products of the widespread criticism of common law models of corporate liability. While the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act fulfils a symbolic denunciatory role, the Bribery Act offence encourages commercial organisations to refine their compliance policies and to manage the risk of bribery by employees or agents. Combined with the continuing relevance of common law models of corporate liability outside of these two offences, the overall picture of corporate criminal liability is more complex, and often no less contested, than before.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 849-878 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Crim. L.R |
| Issue number | 12 |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Research Groups and Themes
- PolicyBristol
Keywords
- corporate manslaiughter
- bribery
- corporate liability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corporate Criminal Liability: A Ten Year Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver